You could be an AML analyst, the head of AML, or a compliance officer. Managing manual processes has left you feeling burdened with growing compliance requirements, more customers and data to manage. Or you might have an in-house solution, but with competing priorities in the IT team it's not being kept updated or in line with what you need. The result is that you’re not confident that your system meets all the requirements of your AML programme and mitigates your company’s risk.
So you’ve made the decision that you need an external solution now. You can clearly see a future where compliance is simpler, a dedicated team is there to help you with questions and keeps you ahead of changing regulations with their knowledge and an always updating system.
Now your task is to get the executives, who will ultimately have to approve this purchase, on board with a clear understanding of what benefits can be realised across the business from an AML technology solution.
While AML compliance has traditionally received begrudging allocation of resources as a requirement, there has been a marked increase in interest from boards and executives following the Westpac case, which has made the risks of significant financial and reputational damage clear. There is an increasing need for internal assurance, ensuring that the program addresses the correct level of risk, that your company is compliant, and that any systems and processes in place as part of the AML programme are working as they should.
While compliance can be viewed as a cost to the business, it's important to show that there is much more than the balance sheet to be considered. While ROI is not as easily calculated with the avoidance of potential fines, there is a financial case that can still be made. Using and maintaining manual or outdated systems can be costly not just for the additional time or people that it takes, but also results in time being spent on low value, repetitive tasks and not being able to investigate suspicious activity in-depth and potentially not detecting some types of financial crime.
Here are some top tips for making your case to your senior executives and board:
Ensure you know who you will be presenting to, and what level of involvement they will have in the final decision. What keeps them up at night? Make sure you keep the concerns of these people front of mind when constructing your case. The C-levels we most often see as key stakeholders are CFOs, CEOs, COOs, CROs and CTOS.
Put together a business case that addresses these critical considerations:
Make sure you have the right level of detail. These aren’t people who will use the system, but they will want to have an overview of what will be possible.
But make sure you are concise. Time is valuable to this group so eliminate filler words that can dilute your message, and use language that is straight forward, confident and doesn’t induce doubt. Examples of these include "may help", "could alleviate" and so on.
Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, you should have an executive sponsor, who will be your voice at the executive table. They will typically be focused on driving improved outcomes for your business through the use of smart technologies, and will likely want to see your cost benefit analysis, which should of course include cost of compliance breaches in similar industries. The sponsor will also be a good sounding board to ensure your business case is solid and makes sense for your organisation. By following these tips, and aligning benefits and outcomes with company strategy, you can personally influence smart technology decisions that can better streamline your compliance and reduce the likelihood of mistakes and unnecessary fines due to misaligned compliance practices.